<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>financial reporting &#8211; Twenty Third Floor</title>
	<atom:link href="https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/tag/financial-reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za</link>
	<description>Perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>IASB re-exposing IFRS 4 Phase 2</title>
		<link>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2012/10/02/iasb-re-expousing-ifrs-4-phase-2/</link>
					<comments>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2012/10/02/iasb-re-expousing-ifrs-4-phase-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 07:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[financial reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentythirdfloor.co.za/?p=2026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, as I expected given the fundamental changes to IFRS 4 in recent months, the IASB is doing the grown-up thing and is re-exposing the latest version of the insurance accounting standard later this year early next year. They are restricting questions to areas that have changed or where final decisions haven&#8217;t been made, which [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, as I expected given the fundamental changes to IFRS 4 in recent months, the IASB is doing the grown-up thing and is<a href="http://www.ifrs.org/Alerts/PressRelease/Pages/insurance-reexposure-28092012.aspx"> re-exposing the latest version of the insurance accounting standard <del>later this year</del> early next year</a>.</p>
<p>They are restricting questions to areas that have changed or where final decisions haven&#8217;t been made, which I suppose is also fair enough and ensures focus is on the key new areas.</p>
<p>Re-exposure for a period, analysis of comments, reworking of any sections as a result of those comments&#8230; There is still a fair amount of work to be done!</p>
<p>Implementation 2016 / 2017 is most likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2012/10/02/iasb-re-expousing-ifrs-4-phase-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A post about a post about accounting standards</title>
		<link>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2012/07/20/a-post-about-a-post-about-accounting-standards/</link>
					<comments>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2012/07/20/a-post-about-a-post-about-accounting-standards/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial reporting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentythirdfloor.co.za/?p=1854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The IASB and FASB are trying to get their heads around expected loss models for credit provisioning. I&#8217;ve seen some of what they&#8217;ve suggested over time and they really have had some odd ideas. Maybe this is one area where actuaries really are more comfortable since it&#8217;s our daily world. Anyway, to the point, it [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IASB and FASB are trying to get their heads around expected loss models for credit provisioning. I&#8217;ve seen some of what they&#8217;ve suggested over time and they really have had some odd ideas. Maybe this is one area where actuaries really are more comfortable since it&#8217;s our daily world.</p>
<p>Anyway, to the point, it looks like their is trouble in paradise.Â  <a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/07/19/1089611/if-this-is-going-to-unravel/">The FT Alphaville guys have a post showing the tense discussion between the two recently.</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what this means for the IFRS4 Phase 2 project and insurance accounting conversion. Well it&#8217;s not good anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2012/07/20/a-post-about-a-post-about-accounting-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
