<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why premium size matters (more than you think)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2007/06/23/why-premium-size-matters-more-than-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2007/06/23/why-premium-size-matters-more-than-you-think/</link>
	<description>Perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Kirk		</title>
		<link>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2007/06/23/why-premium-size-matters-more-than-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-6541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twentythirdfloor.co.za/2007/06/23/why-premium-size-matters-more-than-you-think/#comment-6541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great point, Jennifer. Giving up a little profit by using some surplus-style proportional reinsurance will give you most of the benefits of larger policy sizes, without the added concentration risk and greater profit than an otherwise similar small policy. Thus, the risk and economic capital hit from larger policies can be managed through reinsurance.

You do add in the credit risk of the reinsurer to your total enterprise risk, but given the relative credit rating of direct insurers and reinsurers, this is pretty marginal for almost all insurers. Depending on your financial reporting basis, there is likely to be some more work there in valuing liabilities and a reinsurance asset and the related disclosures. The regulator may also require approval of the reinsurer or the reinsurance programme, and there will always be some administrative overhead in setting up the treaties or negotiating facultative terms on a case-by-case basis.

Reinsurers can also provide some valuable services through underwriting manuals and pricing, but this can&#039;t be considered as a separate benefit because it is ultimately priced into the reinsurance rates either implicitly or explicitly.

Reinsurance is a great area for discussion - I&#039;ll be sure to blog about it in the near future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, Jennifer. Giving up a little profit by using some surplus-style proportional reinsurance will give you most of the benefits of larger policy sizes, without the added concentration risk and greater profit than an otherwise similar small policy. Thus, the risk and economic capital hit from larger policies can be managed through reinsurance.</p>
<p>You do add in the credit risk of the reinsurer to your total enterprise risk, but given the relative credit rating of direct insurers and reinsurers, this is pretty marginal for almost all insurers. Depending on your financial reporting basis, there is likely to be some more work there in valuing liabilities and a reinsurance asset and the related disclosures. The regulator may also require approval of the reinsurer or the reinsurance programme, and there will always be some administrative overhead in setting up the treaties or negotiating facultative terms on a case-by-case basis.</p>
<p>Reinsurers can also provide some valuable services through underwriting manuals and pricing, but this can&#8217;t be considered as a separate benefit because it is ultimately priced into the reinsurance rates either implicitly or explicitly.</p>
<p>Reinsurance is a great area for discussion &#8211; I&#8217;ll be sure to blog about it in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer (Penguin)		</title>
		<link>https://twentythirdfloor.co.za/2007/06/23/why-premium-size-matters-more-than-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-6539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer (Penguin)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twentythirdfloor.co.za/2007/06/23/why-premium-size-matters-more-than-you-think/#comment-6539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice blog! And a good analysis of the larger policies question - one point on your lack of diversification point - at least with large policies you can go for reinsurance - get all the other benefits, without increasing your variability of profits to a point you are uncomfortable with.

(came from David Maister&#039;s site)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog! And a good analysis of the larger policies question &#8211; one point on your lack of diversification point &#8211; at least with large policies you can go for reinsurance &#8211; get all the other benefits, without increasing your variability of profits to a point you are uncomfortable with.</p>
<p>(came from David Maister&#8217;s site)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
