According to News24, a proposed amendment to the Municipal Property Rates Act will see rates on rental properties levied at business rates rather than residential rates.
I don’t have all the figures, but from the examples given this could be a tripling of rates in some cases, taking rates from less than half percentage yield reduction to significantly more than a percentage in many cases. Given common rental yields of, say, 6% for a flat in Joburg, this could be as much as a 15% decline in net rental income.
This must translate into either:
- a 15% reduction in house prices to provide the same net rental yield to investors;
- a 15% increase in rentals (with a corresponding devastating impact on defaults on rentals, voids / availability of tenants, direct and wage-push impacts on CPI inflation and increased transport costs as tenants search for cheaper rental properties further away from central areas; or
- some mixture of the two.
Who bears the burden of the increased tax?
I cannot imagine a scenario where the cost of provision of services will be higher for a rented residential property than for a owner-occupied residential property. Therefore, the increase must be designed as a way of simply increasing tax revenue and shifting the tax burden from one group to another.
Now that’s not automatically a problem – it’s the sort of decision around taxes I regularly blog about as needing to be made. The problem with this is, who is now bearing the burden of the tax increase and is it positive for our economy and public finances? Continue reading

